• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
  • English
  • italiano
  • English
  • italiano
Global site
  • Insights
    • Advisory
      • Advisory
      • Transactional advisory services
      • Valuations
      • Mergers and acquisitions
      • Forensic and investigation services
      • Recovery & reorganisation
      • Business risk services
      • Business consulting
      • Capital market
    • Tax & Legal
      • Tax & Legal
      • Corporate and business tax
      • Direct international tax
      • Global mobility services
      • Indirect international tax
      • Transfer pricing
      • Litigation
      • Family business
      • Legal
    • Outsourcing
      • Outsourcing
      • Back office outsourcing
      • Business process outsourcing
      • Compilation of financial statements
      • Tax compliance
      • Electronic invoicing
      • Electronic storage
      • Revaluation of corporate assets
    • Payroll & Labor Consulting
      • Payroll & Labor Consulting
      • Payroll
      • Labor consultancy
      • HR & Payroll Advisory Services
      • Extended services
      • HR Infinity Portal
    • Technology & Innovation
      • Technology & Innovation
      • Cybersecurity
      • Agile and Programme Management
      • Robotic Process Automation
      • Data strategy and management
      • Enterprise Resource Planning
      • IT strategy
      • IT service management
      • DORA and NIS 2
  • Meet our people
  • Locations
  • About us
  • Careers
  • TopHic
Global site
  1. Home
  2. Forensic & Investigation
  3. Occupational frauds
  4. Occupational frauds: who are the victims?

Who are the victims of occupational frauds?

04 Sep 2018

Occupational frauds: who are the victims?

Occupational frauds: who are the victims

In conducting its Report to the Nations 2018 survey, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) has also investigated the type of organizations that are mostly affected by occupational frauds.

Although no organization is free from the risk of frauds, the typical victim organization is a profit company operating in the private sector. Indeed, the report highlights that approx. 70% of the frauds examined involved profit companies and 42% of these organizations are private companies (against 29% of public companies). Non-profit organizations account for 9%.

The size of an organization can be crucial in a fraud case. As a general rule, big companies are able to allocate greater resources to fraud prevention schemes and to assign duties among the employees so to minimize risks. However, a high number of employees may increase the chance that deceptive people capable of devising complex fraudulent schemes hide among them.

The impact of these frauds in terms of average losses is greater when it comes to small-medium size enterprises (<100 employees). Indeed these are more vulnerable because have a fewer number of fraud prevention systems in place and are exposed to greater risks compared to big organizations.

The report highlights that the average loss for small size enterprises amount to approx. USD 200,000, while companies with more than 100 employees report average losses for approx. USD 104,000.

But how can organizations fight the risk of frauds? First of all by implementing robust and efficient fraud prevention systems as well as efficient pre-emptive detection mechanisms.

Surveys such as the Report to the National 2018 are useful to organizations to understand the most common fraud types and schemes and implement efficient prevention and counter-action instruments.

The industries that are most affected by occupational frauds are the financial services industry, the manufacturing industry and the public sector. The most common fraudulent schemes are: (i) corruption, particularly in the energy, manufacturing and public sectors, (ii) skimming  (taking money from cash receipts) in the arts, entertainment and recreation, food service and hospitality industries, (iii) payroll schemes in the religious, not-for-profit, social and healthcare industries. Interestingly, the fraud cases that affected these sectors tended to involve a crossover between scheme types.

The participants to the ACFE Report to the Nations 2018 survey have received a list of anti-fraud controls to understand which, if any, were present at the victim organization at the time the fraud occurred. The comparison between the losses suffered and the controls in place documents that the presence of anti-fraud controls was correlated with lower fraud losses and a reduction in the duration of the fraud schemes.

Another key fraud prevention action is the attention and care to be used in selecting employees. 52% of the victim organizations ran background checks on their employees before hiring them.  Surprisingly, 10% were alerted to a red flag regarding the perpetrator but chose to hire the person anyway.

It goes without saying that organizations can never afford to lower their guard and must keep an eye open to all signals of conducts that are questionable or on the edge of unlawfulness.

Occupational frauds

Occupational frauds: the ACFE report

Read article
Occupational frauds

How occupational fraud is committed

Read article
Occupational frauds

How to detect an occupational fraud

Read article
Occupational frauds

How the lack of internal control can contribute to frauds

Read article
Occupational frauds

Who are the perpetrators of occupational frauds

Read articles
Share this page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Email

CONNECT CONNECT

  • Contact us
  • Meet our people
  • Global reach
  • Bernoni Grant Thortnon - LinkedIn

ABOUT ABOUT

LEGAL LEGAL

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy & Cookie policy
  • Site map
  • Cookie Preferences

Follow usFollow us

© 2025 Bernoni & Partners. Tax code and VAT n. IT 01692980152 - All rights reserved. "Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Bernoni Grant Thornton (Bernoni & Partners) is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.